Menu
Y-DNA Haplogroup • Paternal Lineage

NO [K

Y-DNA Haplogroup NO [K

~45,000 years ago
Southeast Asia
1 subclades
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

The Story

The journey of Y-DNA haplogroup NO [K

Origins and Evolution

Haplogroup NO sits within the broad K-derived portion of the Y-chromosome phylogeny and is dated to the Upper Paleolithic (approximately 40–50 kya), with a likely origin in Southeast Asia. NO represents a pivotal branching point: it is the immediate ancestral lineage to the well-differentiated haplogroups N and O. The split of NO into N and O marks a major demographic and geographic divergence in northern and eastern Eurasia — one branch (N) moved northward into Siberia and eventually into northeastern Europe, while the other (O) diversified extensively across East and Southeast Asia.

The undifferentiated NO paragroup (samples that are NO* and not assigned to N or O) is rare in modern datasets; most observed diversity is captured within its descendant clades. Genetic and phylogeographic analyses interpret NO as part of a Paleolithic expansion out of Southeast Asia that later fed into both post‑glacial northward movements and later Neolithic demographic processes.

Subclades (if applicable)

The primary and functionally most important sub-branches of NO are:

  • Haplogroup N — Predominantly northern Eurasian, with high frequencies among Uralic-speaking populations, many Siberian groups, and regions of northeastern Europe and the Baltic. N shows signs of postglacial expansions into northern latitudes and later movements associated with historic east–west contacts.

  • Haplogroup O — Extremely diverse and dominant across most of East and Southeast Asia; major subclades of O are strongly associated with Neolithic agricultural expansions, the spread of rice agriculture in East Asia, and later demographic events including the Austronesian dispersal.

Because NO itself is an internal node, discussion of its structure is most informative through the distributions and histories of N and O.

Geographical Distribution

Undifferentiated NO* is rare; most geographical patterns are understood through its descendants:

  • East Asia: Descendant haplogroup O is highly frequent across Han Chinese, Koreans, Japanese and many indigenous East Asian groups, reflecting deep local diversification and Neolithic expansions.
  • Southeast Asia: O lineages are common, including lineages tied to Austronesian-speaking populations and mainland Southeast Asian farmers.
  • Siberia and Northeastern Eurasia: N lineages predominate in many northern populations and among several Siberian groups.
  • Central and South Asia: Low-frequency traces of NO-derived lineages are present due to later migrations and historic contacts.
  • Northern Europe: Presence is primarily indirect and driven by descendant N subclades that reached northeastern Europe during postglacial / later prehistory.

Modern occurrences of NO* (undifferentiated) are very rare; genetic studies typically observe NO only insofar as the branching patterns that produced N and O.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Although NO* itself is not strongly associated with a single archaeological culture, its descendant clades tie the haplogroup to several major prehistoric processes:

  • Post‑glacial northward expansions: Haplogroup N lineages are linked to hunter‑gatherer and re‑expansion processes across Siberia and into northeastern Europe after the Last Glacial Maximum.
  • Neolithic agricultural expansions: Haplogroup O correlates with the spread and demographic growth of East Asian Neolithic farming cultures (e.g., Yangshao and other Yellow River / Yangtze River related farming traditions) and later with coastal expansions such as the Austronesian dispersal.
  • Linguistic and cultural correlates: Descendant lineages show correlations with major linguistic families (e.g., Uralic and some northern Siberian languages for N; Sino‑Tibetan, Austroasiatic, Tai‑Kadai and Austronesian branches for various O subclades), reflecting how paternal lineages moved with or alongside cultural and language shifts in prehistory.

Conclusion

Haplogroup NO is best understood as a key phylogenetic node in Eurasian paternal history: its emergence in Southeast Asia during the Upper Paleolithic set the stage for two wide-ranging descendant radiations. While NO* is uncommon in modern populations, studying its descendants N and O illuminates major Paleolithic, post‑glacial, and Neolithic demographic processes that shaped the genetic landscape of northern, eastern, and Southeast Asia.

Key Points

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Chapter II

Tree & Relationships

Phylogenetic context and subclades

Evolution Path

This haplogroup's evolutionary journey from its earliest ancestor to the present.

Steps Haplogroup Age Estimate Archaeology Era Time Passed Immediate Descendants Tested Modern Descendants Ancient Connections
1 NO [K Current ~45,000 years ago 🦴 Paleolithic 45,000 years 1 0 0
Chapter III

Where in the World

Geographic distribution and modern presence

Place of Origin

Southeast Asia

Modern Distribution

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup NO is found include:

  1. East Asians (e.g., Chinese, Japanese, Koreans)
  2. Southeast Asians (e.g., Vietnamese, Indonesians, Filipinos)
  3. Central Asians (in lower frequencies)
  4. Some populations in Siberia
  5. Some populations in Northern Europe (through its descendant haplogroup N)
  6. Some populations in South Asia (in lower frequencies)

Regional Presence

East Asia High
Southeast Asia Moderate
Central Asia Low
Northern Asia / Siberia Low
Northern Europe Low
CHAPTER IV

When in Time

Your haplogroup in the context of human history

~50k years ago

Upper Paleolithic

Advanced tool-making, art, and cultural explosion

~45k years ago

Haplogroup NO [K

Your Y-DNA haplogroup emerged in Southeast Asia

Southeast Asia
~20k years ago

Last Glacial Maximum

Peak of the last ice age, populations isolated

~10k years ago

Neolithic Revolution

Agriculture begins, settled communities form

~5k years ago

Bronze Age

Metalworking, writing, and early civilizations

~3k years ago

Iron Age

Iron tools, expanded trade networks

~2k years ago

Classical Antiquity

Greek and Roman civilizations flourish

Present

Present Day

Modern era

Your Haplogroup
Historical Era
Chapter IV-B

Linked Cultures

Ancient cultures associated with Y-DNA haplogroup NO [K

Cultural Heritage

These ancient cultures have been linked to haplogroup NO [K based on matching ancient DNA samples from archaeological excavations. The presence of this haplogroup in these cultures provides insights into the migrations and population movements of populations carrying this haplogroup.

Early Buryat Kuenga Culture Lena River Culture Lokomotiv Culture Shamanka Culture
Culture assignments are based on archaeological context of ancient DNA samples and may represent regional associations during specific time periods.
Chapter V

Sample Catalog

Top 50 ancient DNA samples directly related to haplogroup NO [K or parent clades

50 / 50 samples
Portrait Sample Country Era Date Culture Y-DNA Match
Portrait of ancient individual I15156 from Taiwan, dated 1 CE - 800 CE
I15156
Taiwan Iron Age Taiwan 1 CE - 800 CE Taiwanese Iron NO-M214 Direct
Portrait of ancient individual KHO007 from Mongolia, dated 26 CE - 125 CE
KHO007
Mongolia Middle to Late Bronze Age to Xiongnu to Late Medieval Khovd, Mongolia 26 CE - 125 CE Khovd Long-Term N-Tat Direct
Portrait of ancient individual DA171 from Lithuania, dated 50 CE - 650 CE
DA171
Lithuania Late Antiquity Lithuania 50 CE - 650 CE Lithuanian Late Antiquity N-L1025 Direct
Portrait of ancient individual DA171 from Lithuania, dated 50 CE - 650 CE
DA171
Lithuania Late Iron Age Baltic Region 50 CE - 650 CE N-L1025 Direct
Portrait of ancient individual YUR001 from Mongolia, dated 52 BCE - 62 CE
YUR001
Mongolia Xiongnu Period Selenge, Mongolia 52 BCE - 62 CE Xiongnu Culture N-Y125475 Direct
Portrait of ancient individual IMA005 from Russia, dated 169 BCE - 44 BCE
IMA005
Russia Xiongnu Period Buryatia, Russia 169 BCE - 44 BCE Xiongnu Buryat N-P89 Direct
Portrait of ancient individual SON001 from Mongolia, dated 200 BCE - 100 CE
SON001
Mongolia Xiongnu Period Tuv, Mongolia 200 BCE - 100 CE Xiongnu Tuv N-CTS6380 Direct
Portrait of ancient individual BGD004 from Russia, dated 200 BCE - 1 BCE
BGD004
Russia Iron Age Sargat Culture, Russia 200 BCE - 1 BCE Sargat Culture N-L839 Direct
Portrait of ancient individual VK579 from Sweden, dated 200 CE - 400 CE
VK579
Sweden Iron Age Sweden 200 CE - 400 CE Nordic Iron Age N1a1a1a1a Direct
Portrait of ancient individual VK579 from Sweden, dated 200 CE - 400 CE
VK579
Sweden Iron Age Nordic Region 200 CE - 400 CE N-L550 Direct
Chapter VI

Carrier Distribution Map

Geographic distribution of 100 ancient DNA samples carrying haplogroup NO [K

Time Period Filter
All Time Periods
Showing all samples
Each marker represents an ancient individual
Chapter VII

Temporal Distribution

Distribution of carriers across archaeological periods

Chapter VIII

Geographic Distribution

Distribution of carriers by country of origin

Chapter IX

Country × Era Distribution

Cross-tabulation of carrier countries and archaeological periods

Data

Data & Provenance

Source information and data quality

Last Updated 2026-02-16
Confidence Score 50/100
Coverage Low
Data Source

We use the latest phylotree for YDNA haplogroup classification and data.